CASE STUDY · CLARIFALL
When complaint volumes rise, quality must not fall.
How ClariFall helps an energy supplier handle complaint peaks with automatic prioritisation, deadline monitoring and existing team capacity.
Explore the solutionWhen volumes rise, prioritisation must remain reliable. How do you keep sight of the truly critical cases?
A sharp increase in complaint volumes pushed the existing processing approach to its limits. Cases were largely handled in order of arrival, regardless of how close a statutory deadline was. Routine requests and deadline-critical cases ended up in the same queue, while growing backlogs made it harder to maintain an overview. There was no systematic process for identifying risks early and automatically adapting the order of processing.
A wave of complaints meets limited team capacity.
When intake fluctuates sharply, handling cases in order of arrival is no longer sufficient. Critical cases may wait among routine requests, while additional manual work builds up.
Smarter coordination rather than more staff.
The previous approach responded to peaks mainly through overtime and short-term support. ClariFall instead focuses on intake management and the order in which cases are handled.
ClariFall turns complaint volumes into a manageable queue.
Every case is automatically captured and classified on arrival. The processing order is then prioritised according to how close each deadline is. Even the largest peaks become an ordered priority list.
From FIFO to risk-based prioritisation.
Peak loads become easier to plan for
ClariFall helps the existing team work in a structured way even when intake rises sharply, identify deadline risks early and avoid the need for additional manual capacity.